PDF Download , by Joseph Aoun
Other factors are that this publication is written by an inspiring author that has expertise to compose and make a publication. However, the item is easy but significant. It does not utilize the difficult and challenging words to understand. The content that is used is truly meaningful. You can take some exceptional reasons of reviewing , By Joseph Aoun when you have actually started reading his publication wisely.
, by Joseph Aoun
PDF Download , by Joseph Aoun
Million advantages of book can be taken all if you don't just have it as yours. It will occur when you review the book, web page by web page, to complete. Besides, review it very well could help you to alleviate obtaining the lesson. The lesson as well as benefits of the books as we states might be many. You are possibly not conscious that exactly what you really feel and also do now become some parts of checking out benefits of such publication formerly.
When you require a publication to check out currently, , By Joseph Aoun can be a choice due to the fact that this is among the updated books to review. It makes certain that when you have brand-new thing to consider, you need inspirations to resolve t. and when you have time to check out, guides become one solution to take. Also this book is thought about as new publication, lots of people put their trusts on it. It will recognize you to be among them that are falling in love to read.
Based on that situation, it's clear that your time to read this publication will certainly not invest squandered. You could begin to overcome this soft data publication to like better reading product. Yeah, finding this publication as reading publication will certainly use you unique experience. The fascinating topic, simple words to understand, as well as appealing improvement make you feel comfortable to just read this , By Joseph Aoun
When much of them are still perplexed of how you can get this book, you have actually been here. The ideal area to find lots of book groups consisted of , By Joseph Aoun It's so simple to get exactly how this publication is disclosed. You could only check out, browse, as well as locate the title of the book that you intend to obtain. Lots of books from lots of sources as well as countries are presented. So, you might to visit various other site to find the precise books to have today.
Product details
File Size: 497 KB
Print Length: 216 pages
Publisher: The MIT Press (August 18, 2017)
Publication Date: August 18, 2017
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07536X6Y4
Text-to-Speech:
Enabled
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $ttsPopover = $('#ttsPop');
popover.create($ttsPopover, {
"closeButton": "false",
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "256",
"popoverLabel": "Text-to-Speech Popover",
"closeButtonLabel": "Text-to-Speech Close Popover",
"content": '
});
});
X-Ray:
Not Enabled
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $xrayPopover = $('#xrayPop_76AC12EA442411E9B71603BC091BCCCA');
popover.create($xrayPopover, {
"closeButton": "false",
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "256",
"popoverLabel": "X-Ray Popover ",
"closeButtonLabel": "X-Ray Close Popover",
"content": '
});
});
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Not Enabled
Screen Reader:
Supported
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $screenReaderPopover = $('#screenReaderPopover');
popover.create($screenReaderPopover, {
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "500",
"content": '
"popoverLabel": "The text of this e-book can be read by popular screen readers. Descriptive text for images (known as “ALT textâ€) can be read using the Kindle for PC app if the publisher has included it. If this e-book contains other types of non-text content (for example, some charts and math equations), that content will not currently be read by screen readers.",
"closeButtonLabel": "Screen Reader Close Popover"
});
});
Enhanced Typesetting:
Enabled
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $typesettingPopover = $('#typesettingPopover');
popover.create($typesettingPopover, {
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "256",
"content": '
"popoverLabel": "Enhanced Typesetting Popover",
"closeButtonLabel": "Enhanced Typesetting Close Popover"
});
});
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#52,813 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
This book is excellent marketing material for Northeastern University, a Boston-area university of which the author (JA) is currently president. The idea of protecting graduates from obsolescence at the hands (effectors?) of robots and AI will be appealing to many students and their parents. The school’s “co-op†program, which features something like internships integrated more directly than usual into the university’s curriculum, sounds very exciting; I wondered how a program like that might have shaped my career had it been available to me when I was in college (assuming I’d been wise enough at that age to take advantage of it).But the book’s grander vision of what a university should be — a launching pad for inserting students into economic life, and a maintenance garage for keeping them competitive throughout their careers — is narrow and inadequate. While JA’s pleading in defense of humanities and liberal arts is an important and welcome theme in the book, he grounds his argument on those subjects’ instrumental value in teaching economically useful skills that AI can’t (as yet) replicate. More generally, his view of the skills that should be imparted to college students is in some ways naive, some important aspects of implementation aren’t thought through, and his hype reaches occasionally absurd heights.JA proposes to counterbalance the rise of robotics with “humanics.†One aspect of this field is reflected in three “new literaciesâ€:a) “Technological Literacy,†knowledge of mathematics, coding and basic engineering principles;b) “Data Literacy,†meaning the ability to use data, and also to understand its limitations; andc) “Human Literacy,†which “equips us for the social milieu, giving us the power to communicate, engage with others, and tap into out human capacity for grace and beauty†(@59).Of these, “data literacy†might be the newest type — if one overlooks its roots in classical rhetoric and the analysis of arguments. (Unfortunately, the exposition of this literacy seems a little illiterate, as when it this overestimates the power of correlations: “Based on the correlations we discover, we are able to understand the real meaning of the information and then extrapolate accurate predictions from it,â€@57.) On the other hand, the clumsily-named “human literacy†seems like something universities have been interested in for decades, if not centuries. “Technological literacy†too is hardly new: at least regarding coding, it’s something many universities have latched on to in recent years. It’s puzzling, though, why engineering should be emphasized to the exclusion of natural science. Nor is JA’s rationale entirely persuasive when it comes to why coding should be a required piece of the curriculum: “Because coding is the lingua franca of the digital world, everyone should be conversant in it†(55). Was everyone “conversant†in mechanics when machines were the dominant technology globally? Alternatively, since technologies like CRISPR will no doubt lead to a rise in “bathtub biotech,†why shouldn’t everyone be conversant in genetic manipulation? (Maybe the way to beat down the threat of AI is to create some new *real* I.) This isn’t to say it would necessarily be a bad idea for more people to learn coding — but JA’s argument is very superficial. It’s not the only place in the book where important issues are glossed over.Complementing these in the “humanics†toolbox are the four “cognitive capacitiesâ€:i) Critical Thinking, “which is about analyzing ideas skillfully and then applying them fruitfully†(@62);ii) Systems Thinking, which “sees the details and the entire tableau, exercising our mental strength to weigh complexity while also testing our grasp on multiple strands of thought†(@66);iii) Entrepreneurship, which JA does not define, but which “should be a baseline capacity for all college learners,†and which “functions in two dimensions,†including “the traditional start-up model,†and “the context of established institutions and businesses†(@67); andiv) “Cultural Agility,†“the mega-competency that enables professionals to perform successfully in cross-cultural situations†(quoting Paula Caligiuri), which “requires a deep enough immersion in a culture [sic] so that we can fit seamlessly into multicultural teams or get results from people who have dramatically different lives from our own†(@71).Each of these definitions seems to me problematic. Aside from the question of what “fruitful†application means, surely critical thinking includes analyzing ideas and *rejecting* some of them. It also includes a wide range of activities that overlaps with “data literacy,†such as evaluating both the premises and conclusions of arguments, as well as whether the latter are well-based on the former. In any case, this is one of the most traditional functions of a university, going back to the University of Bologna, founded over 900 years ago as a school of law. “Systems thinking†is an ambiguous term: one of the characteristics of a “system†is that it has a boundary, yet JA seems to think of it as a kind of holism. Often a good use of critical thinking is to question whether system boundaries are appropriate, but JA doesn’t connect these two faculties. The definition of “cultural agility†is by turns unclear and troubling. How can “immersion in a culture†enable us to fit seamlessly into multicultural teams? E.g., I was immersed in American culture growing up, and am now immersed in Japanese culture - would these immersions enable me to fit into a team of Iraqis, Russians and Nigerians? Or was it the alienation of my immersion in the WASP culture of my Ivy League college in the 1970s that made me “agileâ€? Perhaps it’s immersion in a *multicultural* environment that enables students to become more multicultural? Clearly, this concept needs to be thought through some more. The troubling bit is the reference to “get[ting] results from people who have dramatically different lives from our own†— as with much else in the book, this introduces an instrumental, even exploitative element that we probably do NOT want universities to be teaching.But it’s JA’s emphasis on entrepreneurship that I felt most missed the mark. (Is this a cognitive capacity, BTW, or is it instead a *behavior*?) First, it’s naïve for JA to believe that universities are terrific repositories of entrepreneurial experience, who can incubate and advise people in the business world (“Universities, with their critical masses of active minds, are ideal entrepreneurial ecosystems,†@69). In my previous experience as a Silicon Valley lawyer and as a corporate VC, university personnel are generally among the most arrogant and least realistic people to deal with. They have very little comprehension of the difficulties of manufacturing at scale, of retaining technical staff, and of selling. Significantly, they also tend to have very little experience at failure, which is why they were able to get hired by and advance in their university positions. At least 9 out of 10 entrepreneurial ventures fail. What does the typical tenured professor, or university president, know about being out of a job and perhaps losing their home?It’s also naïve to believe that anyone can be, or would enjoy being, an entrepreneur, just as not everyone is cut out to be a salesperson. To make this be a “baseline capacity†for all who attend college would terribly restrict the number of people admitted to university. Perhaps some would offer the counterargument that entrepreneurism is a “capacity†that can be taught, like coding. So let me ask: how many university graduates had to learn calculus? In US 4-year universities, almost everyone. And yet how many people remember it? How many use it in their daily lives? (This same argument applies to coding, BTW.) The fact that a subject is taught as a required subject isn’t sufficient to turn it into a “baseline capacity†that people will use in their lives. Anyway, do we really *want* a society full of hustling entrepreneurs, like the Ferengi in the Star Trek mythoverse? And why would a society full of selfish optimizers be particularly robot-proof? Wouldn’t humanity’s best resistance to robots be a society that *departed* from the Homo economicus sort of “rationality,†instead of predictably embodying it?This last question opens out on several other aspects of the book that troubled me. JA puts great store by the views of “the C-suite,†i.e., the topmost levels of corporate management. Why are they particularly endowed with vision about what the job market will be in the future, rather than in the next few years only? Capitalism has created many of the problems we now face — rising inequality, environmental degradation, new technological forms of invasion of privacy and government repression; why should we look to its captains for a vision of what universities should be? Shouldn’t universities also be able to contemplate alternatives to capitalism? What about other functions of a university — to allow students to deepen their understanding of political participation and citizenship, and to research, preserve and transmit culture and humanistic values not related to earning a living? And what about the role of a university in developing and encouraging students’ *curiosity*? Like politics and inequality, which are mentioned only in passing, this isn’t a topic that receives any attention in this book.At times JA’s pitch goes to absurd lengths. Take his exhortation that every course syllabus “ought to describe the four cognitive capacities developed through each step of study and discussion†(@74). This made me wonder how entrepreneurship should have been stressed in one of my favorite college courses, where we read most of James Joyce’s works. Should we have spent less time discussing Joyce’s style, humor and philosophical erudition, and concentrated more on the career of Leopold Bloom, the main character of “Ulysses,†who spent the daytime hours of the novel roaming Dublin trying to sell ads in the newspaper that employed him? Should the prof in the Italian Renaissance paintings course I audited have spent less time showing us old paintings, and more on talking about how he got a gig advising the Italian government on restoring paintings after a flood in Florence? Should my undergrad seminar in astrophysics have been cancelled because, as my mother used to tease me with a smile, “You’re studying astronomy? Very nice. So, what kind of money can you make as an astronomerâ€?My credulity was stretched beyond breaking point near the end of the book, in a passage outlining the lifetime experience of a “young learner†with a “multi-university network†in Boston, Charlotte, Seattle and Silicon Valley. She starts by taking computer science and business in Boston, then gets “co-ops†at Amazon and a top Seattle law firm, launches a social media venture, later takes some modules (along with members of her team) at a Silicon Valley-based institution to learn about VR, then goes to Charlotte a few years later to brush up on M&A before selling her company (@136-137). Come on, what percentage of the college-going population is going to have such an experience? Even at an Ivy League school only a small fraction of graduates will follow such a path.One might attribute this absurd exaltation of entrepreneurship to a failure of critical thinking, but I think something else is at work. This vision that turns every student into a Zuckerberg — who BTW attended a college no more expensive than Northeastern, and without a “humanics†curriculum — illustrates the divergence between the marketing document that the book is meant to be, and the serious consideration of future education that the unsuspecting reader might be expecting. Every parent wants to believe their son or daughter will turn into a star. And every university wants those parents to believe that their institution is the key to that dream.JA deserves a lot of credit for raising the national ranking of Northeastern from below #100 to around #40 in the years he has been in charge. And I can’t grudge him publishing a book like this to try to do the best for his school — it’s very well done. But if you’re looking for a more realistic appraisal of the future of education — and especially one that resists drinking the Silicon Valley Kool-Aid — you won’t find it here.
This was a very disappointing book. It is basically an advertisement for the author's university. He asserts effectiveness of his favorite approaches but provides essentially no evidence for his claims. Though the whole theme is the ability of future students to deal with AI, there is no evidence that he has examined what AI can and can not do, and which deficiencies are likely to go away in the future. While "experiential" learning (a fancy name for learning by doing) is a great idea, this book provides little data showing when it helps and when it doesn't -- in fact, this book doesn't provide much data on anything. Even the review of the history of the US university system is rather superficial. Read Derek Bok's "The Struggle to Reform Our Colleges" or Cathy Davidson's "The New Education" if you actually want to learn something about higher education in the 21s century.
Aoun gives a clear prediction of the future, and the only thing certain is change. The job market will most likely change drastically with the rapid onset of mechanization, smarter software, and AI and not even currently high-paying jobs like doctors, lawyers, or financiers are safe. The key for educating the student of the future lies in what he calls cognitive capacities that only humans posses (for now). Great read for anyone employed in higher education.
An intuitive and smartly informed view of the future educational needs of our nation. Every one invested in higher education should read and use to inform curricular innovations.
Education is not only the means but the solution as well. Indeed, automation, AI and ML will make very, if not extremely, difficult to have jobs, work or office hours as we currently have in the near future. The first thing that are going to be automated will be activities, not carreers. But if carreers do not reinvent themselves, they will soon be replaced by machines. Author Joseph E. Aoun offers a personal insight into what universities need to be looking at in order to renew the current curricula. A must read for anyone with curiosity who wants to know how academia should respond to nowadays and current technology trends.
Excellent outline of what today's society needs the university to be. Perhaps Dr. Aoun will write a second book about the extraordinary leadership that can move a university from the entrenched 16h century model to an institution that is relevant to 21st century learning.
Timely piece that recasts the university as the place whose mission is to provide future skilled workers with training at higher and more sophisticated levels. In the end it is about securing and sustaining jobs. There is no serious consideration given to ethical practices and citizenship. What is presented as "humanics." This is presented as the practical response to the contributions of the social sciences and the humanities. The tragedy is that Joseph Aoun my be on track in terms of the creation of a higher level vocational school that produces workers disguised as a university.
A must read for higher education to transform content and pedagogy. Lecture is dead — just get over it and start engaging students with real world projects.
, by Joseph Aoun PDF
, by Joseph Aoun EPub
, by Joseph Aoun Doc
, by Joseph Aoun iBooks
, by Joseph Aoun rtf
, by Joseph Aoun Mobipocket
, by Joseph Aoun Kindle
